Gemini

AI modelis Google's AI assistant, available as a web app and mobile app on iOS and Android [S25](https://AI model.google.com/app) [S23](https://AI model.google.com/app/download). It helps users generate and edit images through the Nano Banana 2 model, create text-based content, and conduct research [S1](https://AI model.google.com/overview/image-generation). Its practical value lies in providing a versatile AI tool for creative and productivity tasks, with a free tier and paid plans for expanded access [S1](https://AI model.google.com/overview/image-generation).

• Identity: AI modelis Google's AI assistant, offered as a web and mobile app [S25](https://AI model.google.com/app) [S23](https://AI model.google.com/app/download).
• Core purpose: It helps users create images, edit photos, and get help with various tasks through AI [S1](https://AI model.google.com/overview/image-generation) [S25](https://AI model.google.com/app).
• Intended users: Consumers and professionals seeking an AI assistant for creative and productivity tasks [S1](https://AI model.google.com/overview/image-generation) [S25](https://AI model.google.com/app).
• Product scope: A single assistant app with integrated features like image generation and editing, not a platform [S1](https://AI model.google.com/overview/image-generation).
• Positioning: Positioned as a versatile AI assistant from Google, emphasizing creativity and responsibility [S1](https://AI model.google.com/overview/image-generation).
• Claimed distinction: Its image generation model, Nano Banana 2, is designed for high-quality creation and editing [S1](https://AI model.google.com/overview/image-generation).

AI model.google.com is the public website evaluated in this SEO report. AI model.google.com: an estimated 2,641,252,633 total monthly visits and about 31,634,145 monthly organic visits across 2,941 ranking keywords. Scout crawled 0 pages and measured a technical health score of 0/100.

• Total traffic (modeled): 2,641,252,633 monthly visits across all channels.
• Organic search traffic (estimated): 31,634,145 monthly visits from search.
• Strongest sampled ranking: a.i at position 1.
• Leading page in the collected evidence: <https://AI model.google.com/>.
• Closest measured organic competitor: youtube.com, appearing 10 times in the sampled first-page SERPs.
• Technical crawl: 0 pages, health score 0/100.

Website intelligence — Collected evidence

Company identity and positioning

No supporting public-page evidence was collected for this category.

Total website traffic

Domain identity

Website capture

Top organic keywords

Independent Google result page

Query: a.i

Website intelligence — Collected evidence

Prioritized website intelligence pages

Features

No supporting public-page evidence was collected for this category.

Pricing and plans

No supporting public-page evidence was collected for this category.

Integrations and supported platforms

Product and company updates

No supporting public-page evidence was collected for this category.

This analysis created the first position baseline at 2026-10-18T04:26:20.457Z. Movement appears after the next fresh analysis using the same location and language.

Microsoft CopilotMicrosoft Copilot | Sign inIntegrates web chat, image creation, and research features much like Gemini, but leverages Microsoft's ecosystem and OpenAI models with free and enterprise pricing.

1 verified

Sampled competitors

Website intelligence — Collected evidence

Customers, testimonials, and first-party review claims

No supporting public-page evidence was collected for this category.

Independent review sources discovered

Backlink comparison profile

• Domain rating: 100/100
• Backlinks: 45,757,017
• Referring domains: 113,818
• Dofollow backlinks: 83.0%
• Dofollow referring domains: 85.0%

Collection decision

The Scout search index remains intentionally excluded from automatic Scout analysis. This Scout traffic model profile costs 5 credits (0.5 cents) and is included in the first comparison run so its usefulness can be judged before the recurring collection is finalized.

AI-assistant referral traffic

• Estimated current generative-AI referral share: 1.1%

Website intelligence — Collected evidence

Site-stated AI capabilities

These are first-party product claims, not independent measurements of AI-search visibility.

Website intelligence — Collected evidence

Website evidence gaps

• pricing: no usable public page was collected; verify whether the site publishes this evidence.
• features: no usable public page was collected; verify whether the site publishes this evidence.
• customers: no usable public page was collected; verify whether the site publishes this evidence.
• reviews: no usable public page was collected; verify whether the site publishes this evidence.
• changes: no usable public page was collected; verify whether the site publishes this evidence.
• identity: no usable public page was collected; verify whether the site publishes this evidence.
• technical: no usable public page was collected; verify whether the site publishes this evidence.

Independent reviews

Customer proof

No named customers, testimonials, or customer case studies were found.

Independent mentions

• AI model’s web UI and mobile app are horrible... — AI model’s web UI and mobile app are horrible. AI modeloutputs malformed links that lead BACK to AI model.google.com. There are constant bugs with the side panel not showing your chats or the current chat timing out for no reason. Also, the mobile app has an issue if your text input is too long where the entire text entry box lags, even to the point of locking up the entire app. Openrouter’s web ui runs circles around all the frontier lab UIs. I even prefer their PWA to any of these mobile apps.
• Ask HN: AI modelStatus — Hi, asking this again as it's got even worse today. I'm seeing 75% of my 'chat UI' on AI model.google.com fail with "Something went wrong" and API responses taking 100s+ to come back. ... over the past weeks (but especially today) reliability has
• Ask HN: How to get rid of AI model? — After the google+ fiasco I thought Google had learned their lesson about ramming new products down people's throats whether they like them or not, but with AI modelit seems like this lesson has been forgotten. I usually am a pretty happy user of Google's products but they have really ruined the experience for me (and on top of that they are charging extra for the privilege of ruining the experience). Is there a way to completely and permanently get rid of AI modelin such a way that my normal workf
• Something I've noticed is that AI modelthrough AI model.google.com... — Something I've noticed is that AI modelthrough AI model.google.com or through the mobile apps is vastly inferior to AI modelthrough aistudio.google.com. Much worse handling of long contexts amongst other things. Very odd that a product that is free (AI Studio use is free), is much worse than the product I am paying 20 quid a month for. I find this to be especially true for the newer models like "AI model", so if you haven't tried AI Studio yet, I'd give that a go.
• AI modelin Chrome / Hacker News — I spent 10 mins trying to find a clear statement of whether Google ... submitted to AI modelfor training and I couldn't find one. It is ... because there are many statements that vaguely sound like they should address it but then don't properly do that
• There is generally something about the AI modelmodels which feels a bit different... / Hacker News — can add oneself, which I never do) than the one at AI model.google.com. I never use AI model.google.com because of the lack of a simple export feature. And it's not even possible to save one chat to disk (well, neither do the others), I just wish it did.
• I think AI modelis just broken. Instead of forwarding model-generated links to ht... / Hacker News — of forwarding model-generated links to https://www.google.com/ ... serves the purpose of malware check and user-facing warning about linking to an external site, AI modelforwards links to https://www. ... does... a Google search for the URL, which isn't
• &gt; the squealing carcass called AI modelHave you used AI model? It seems every bit a... / Hacker News — will fall over itself to agree with you that it's terribly sorry, you are right, the sky is green, down is up, and 3 + 4 = 8. This makes it next to useless, because it's not expanding your knowledgebase, it limits itself to whatever you think is true.

External links were grounded in one live web search. Search snippets are leads, not independently scraped page content; rejected links remain available in Review evidence.

Not found on the collected pages: company and ownership, security and compliance, uptime and status page. This only means Scout did not find it on the pages it read; it says nothing about the company itself.

Not established in the collected sources.

Not measurable: wayback: rate limited by archive.org, ladder stopped after 1 probe(s); rdap: HTTP 404. A gap here means the lookup was unavailable, not that the finding is negative.

Scout — Bounded technical crawl

• Pages crawled: 0 of 15 maximum
• Technical health: 0/100
• Critical issues: 0
• Warnings: 0
• Notices: 0

Issues

The bounded crawl did not detect title, description, H1, canonical, indexing, thin-content, image-alt, response-time, or duplicate-metadata issues.

Crawled pages

The website did not return crawlable HTML pages.

This is a bounded Scout crawl. Core Web Vitals and Lighthouse scores are not claimed unless a dedicated performance audit is connected.

Modeled acquisition channels

First-party connections

No first-party Search Console or Analytics numbers are shown until the site owner authorizes the corresponding Google account. Scout traffic model values above are modeled estimates, not private analytics totals.

The collected pages focus on the Nano Banana 2 image generation feature and general assistant capabilities. Evidence gaps include: no detailed feature documentation for the broader assistant, no customer testimonials or case studies, no information on data export or performance, and no mention of competitors. The pricing page was not collected directly, but an authoritative summary was provided.

This report is based on 6 collected pages from AI model.google.com, including the image generation overview, app download page, and main app page. The evidence catalog includes 27 items, with a mix of product descriptions, feature explanations, and trust signals. An external proof search was performed but no additional verification was collected. Limitations include incomplete coverage of the site (6 of 8 pages) and reliance on a provided pricing summary rather than the full pricing page.

• Documentationhttps://gemini.google.com/appVerified
• Official Websitehttps://gemini.google.com/overview/image-generationVerified
• Documentationhttps://gemini.google.com/app/downloadVerified
• Official Websitehttps://gemini.google.com/imagesVerified
• Documentationhttps://gemini.google.com/app?android-min-version=301779666&is_sa=1&campaign_id=in_kbcquiz_2026_paid_universal_autosubmit&utm_source=partnership&utm_medium=paid&utm_campaign=in_kbcquiz_2026_paid_universal_autosubmit&pt=9008&mt=8&ct=in_kbc_quiz&redirect=homeVerified
• Articlehttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47204800Verified
• Articlehttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44159634Verified
• Articlehttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44356422Verified
• Articlehttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43663059Verified
• Review Sitehttps://www.tryorbye.com/products/google-geminiVerified
• Articlehttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45297331Verified
• Articlehttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43587327Verified
• Articlehttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46240351Verified
• Articlehttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42319302Verified
• Articlehttps://reddit.sentinel-team.org/posts/1vg5fog/snapshots/2026-08-07T07%3A30%3A04.571943ZVerified